How we report, research, verify information, and handle errors. These standards govern all content published on theaiinsider. tech.
Every piece of content published on AI Insider goes through a defined editorial process. The specifics vary by content type, but the principles remain constant: accuracy, transparency, and relevance to our audience. Our editorial team is responsible for all editorial decisions and operates independently from our client-facing advisory and marketing teams.
Our news desk covers daily developments across artificial intelligence, machine learning, and applied AI. Sources include company announcements, peer-reviewed publications (arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, JMLR), model and system cards, regulatory filings (EU AI Act notifications, U.S. executive orders, national AI strategies), government press releases, and direct communication with company representatives. We verify claims against public filings and technical literature before publication. When a story involves financial data (funding rounds, revenue figures, market caps), we cross-reference against at least one independent source.
AI Insider’s marketing division operates as a separate client delivery function from our editorial team. Sponsored content is clearly labelled as such and does not influence our editorial calendar or news coverage.
AI Insider attributes all quoted material to named sources. Anonymous sourcing is used only when necessary to protect a source’s professional standing, and only when the information has been corroborated by at least one additional source. We link to primary sources (research papers, official announcements, regulatory filings, model cards) wherever possible.
AI Insider uses AI tools to support research, data analysis, and content production workflows. AI-generated content is always reviewed and edited by a named human editor before publication. We do not publish AI-generated content without human editorial oversight. When AI tools have been used as a substantive part of the reporting or analysis process, we note this in the article. Given the nature of our subject matter, we hold ourselves to a higher standard than most newsrooms on AI disclosure: where an AI system meaningfully shaped the analysis, we say so.
AI Insider is committed to accuracy in all published content. When we make a factual error, we correct it promptly and transparently. We do not silently edit published articles to remove or change information without disclosure.
A correction is issued when a published article contains a material factual error, such as an incorrect funding amount, a misattributed quote, or a factual claim that is demonstrably wrong. Corrections are noted at the top of the article with the date and a description of what was changed.
An update is added when significant new information becomes available after publication that changes the context or conclusions of an article. Updates are noted at the top or bottom of the article with the date and nature of the update.
A clarification is issued when published language was technically accurate but could reasonably be misinterpreted.
In rare cases where an article is found to be fundamentally flawed or based on false information, we retract it. Retracted articles are replaced with a retraction notice. The original URL is preserved.
If you believe an AI Insider article contains a factual error, please contact us with the article URL, a description of the error, and supporting evidence. Our editorial team will review and respond within two business days.
AI Insider is a platform within Resonance. Learn more about AI Insider.